Long-term Efficacy and Safety of High-frequency Spinal Stimulation for Chronic Pain: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our meta-analysis was to systematically assess the enduring effectiveness and safety of high-frequency spinal stimulation (HF-SCS) in the management of chronic pain. METHODS: We developed a comprehensive literature search strategy to identify clinical trials investigating the efficacy of high-frequency spinal stimulation for chronic pain. The search was conducted in multiple databases, including Web of Science, Cochrane, PubMed, and Embase, covering the period from 2004 to 2023. The inclusion and exclusion criteria established for this study were applied to screen the eligible literature by carefully reviewing abstracts and, when necessary, examining the full text of selected articles. To assess the quality of the included studies, we utilized the risk of bias assessment tool provided by the Cochrane Collaboration.The PRISMA method was followed for the selection of articles, and the quality of the articles was evaluated using the risk assessment table for bias provided by the Cochrane Collaboration.Meta-analysis of the selected studies was performed using Review Manager 5.4 and STATA 16.0. Effect sizes for continuous data were reported as mean differences (MD) or standardized mean differences (SMD), while categorical data were analyzed using relative risks (RR). RESULTS: According to our predefined literature screening criteria, a total of seven English-language randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the meta-analysis. The findings from the meta-analysis demonstrated that high-frequency spinal cord stimulation (HF-SCS) exhibited superior efficacy in the long-term treatment of chronic pain when compared to the control group (RR = 2.44, 95% CI [1.20, 4.96], P = 0.01). Furthermore, HF-SCS demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the Oswestry Disability Index score (mean difference MD = 3.77, 95% CI [1.17, 6.38], P = 0.005).However, for pain assessment (standardized mean difference SMD = -0.59, 95% CI [-1.28, 0.10], P = 0.09), Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) score (MD = 0.11, 95% CI [-0.66, 0.88], P = 0.78 for 6 months; MD = 0.02, 95% CI [-0.42, 0.43], P = 0.97 for 12 months), Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) score (MD = -0.58, 95% CI [-1.62, 0.43], P = 0.27 for 6 months; MD = -0.23, 95% CI [-0.94, 0.48], P = 0.52 for 12 months), and occurrence of adverse effects (odds ratio OR = 0.77, 95% CI [0.23, 2.59], P = 0.67) from a statistical point of view, HF-SCS did not show sufficient effect compared with the control group. Not significant enough to consider it. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from our comprehensive review and meta-analysis, encompassing research from 2004 to 2023, offer encouraging data about the prolonged efficacy and safety of HF-SCS in chronic pain management. Nonetheless, recognizing the constraints of the existing evidence is crucial. Upcoming clinical trials, meticulously planned and stringent, are essential to bolster the current body of evidence and reach more conclusive findings.

Pain Reduction and Changes in Serum Cortisol, Adrenocorticotropic Hormone, and Glucose Levels after Epidural Injections With Different Doses of Corticosteroid.

BACKGROUND: An epidural steroid injection (ESI) effectively relieves acute lumbar discogenic radicular pain. Corticosteroids, a key ESI component, reduce pain by curbing inflammation and blocking pain signal transmission via C-fibers. While prior research confirms the efficacy of 40 mg and 80 mg methylprednisolone, the effectiveness of lower doses remains uncertain. OBJECTIVES: This trial aimed to compare the pain-relieving effects of ESI using varying methylprednisolone doses (10 mg, 20 mg, and 40 mg). Additionally, it sought to examine changes in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), serum cortisol, and serum adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) levels across these groups. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective observational study. SETTING: Department of Pain Medicine, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, People's Republic of China. METHODS: Ninety-three patients underwent a single epidural injection of methylprednisolone at different doses: 10 mg (n = 28), 20 mg (n = 32), and 40 mg (n = 33). We evaluated their Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) score and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score at preinjection and 7 days postinjection. We also measured FPG, serum cortisol, and ACTH levels at baseline and one day postinjection. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed in the likelihood of achieving substantial pain relief among the 3 groups at 7 days postinjection. Specifically, 10 mg vs 20 mg had an odds ratio (OR) of 6.546 (95% CI, 1.161 - 26.513, P = 0.008), and 10 mg vs 40 mg had an OR of 7.753 (95% CI, 1.98 - 30.353, P = 0.003). However, there was no significant difference between 40 mg and 20 mg, with an OR of 0.844 (95% CI, 0.239 - 2.987, P = 0.793) in Model 3. Additionally, the baseline NRS-11 score significantly predicted substantial pain relief, with an OR of 0.47 (95% CI, 0.287 - 0.768, P = 0.003). Furthermore, at 7 days postinjection, the ODI score was significantly lower in the 20 mg group (P = 0.007) and the 40 mg group (P < 0.001) compared to the 10 mg group. Moreover, the difference in serum cortisol and FPG between the 40 mg and 10 mg groups was more pronounced (P < 0.01), while the difference in ACTH was similar among all 3 groups (P = 0.191). LIMITATIONS: Potential selection bias and a short follow-up period may have influenced our study, and certain imaging results were omitted from the regression models. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of ESI in relieving pain was found to be similar for both 20 mg and 40 mg doses, but with fewer changes in FPG and serum cortisol levels for the former (which were not statistically significant). As a result, it may be clinically viable to use a 20 mg dose for achieving short-term pain relief. Moreover, the baseline NRS-11 scores were found to be a reliable predictor of pain relief efficacy, with milder baseline pain intensity being associated with better pain relief outcomes.

Safety and Efficacy of Albumin for Pump Priming in Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of albumin as pump priming fluid in cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. SETTING: Each study was conducted in a surgical center or intensive care unit. PARTICIPANTS: Adult and pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass who received circuit priming fluids. INTERVENTIONS: Extracorporeal circuit priming with either albumin or crystalloid. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Fourteen eligible randomized controlled trials with 741 patients were included in the present meta-analysis. Albumin prime had lower bleeding (CI -202.20 to -142.88 mL, p < 0.00001) and showed a greater advantage in preserving platelet counts (CI 14.85-21.48 × 103 mm-3, p < 0.00001), maintaining colloid osmotic pressure and sustaining negative fluid balance. No significant differences were found in the remaining study outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Albumin was shown to be safe and efficacious in extracorporeal circulation perfusion. However, its clinical advantages were not clearly highlighted, as there were no significant differences in the number of deaths, length of hospital stay, or intensive care unit duration. The results should be interpreted cautiously, as most included studies were small in scale, and the total number of participants was limited.

New progress in roles of nitric oxide during hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury.

Hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury (HIRI) is a clinical condition which may lead to cellular injury and organ dysfunction. The role of nitric oxide (NO) in HIRI is complicated and inconclusive. NO produced by endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) activation plays a protective role during early HIRI. But eNOS overexpression and the resulting excessive NO bioavailability can aggravate liver injury. NO induced by inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) may have either a protective or a deleterious effect during the early phase of HIRI, but it may protect the liver during late HIRI. Here, we reviewed the latest findings on the role of NO during HIRI: (1) NO exerts a protective effect against HIRI by increasing NO bioavailability, downregulating p53 gene expression, decreasing inflammatory chemokines, reducing ROS via inhibiting the mitochondrial respiratory chain, activating sGC-GTP-cGMP signal pathway to reduce liver cell apoptosis, and regulating hepatic immune functions; (2) eNOS protects against HIRI by increasing NO levels, several eNOS/NO signal pathways (such as Akt-eNOS/NO, AMPK-eNOS/NO and HIF-1α-eNOS/NO) participating in the anti-HIRI process, and inhibiting over-expression of eNOS also protects against HIRI; and (3) the inhibition of iNOS prevents HIRI. Thus, the adverse effects of NO should be avoided, but its positive effect in the clinical treatment of diseases associated with HIRI should be recognized.